Zoo Zoo Gallery

Everyone has their own style, as his own nose, but there would not be quite decent ... mock decent person because of his nose, however strange it may be.
G. Lessing (1729-1781), German playwright

In light of the many people and everyone builds his life on his own, a little differently than everyone else. However, some believe that other people live in the same way as they do: just look at life, think the same thoughts and commit the same acts. Some, however, convinced that he is - a bright personality and that his life has nothing to do with the life of others. In fact, people are not the same, but not completely different: one can distinguish groups of people similar to each other to their perception of the world and your lifestyle. Style is composed of individual components, sometimes a component of one, sometimes several ... Here are some of them

Child. This style is inherent in most children and to some of the adults. I - the center of the earth. Everything that exists in this world, created for me. My mother feeds me, my father bought toys. In this world everything is great: there is chocolate, carousels, cartoons ... True, the world has one drawback: not all I can. Do not give to stick his finger in the socket, do not allow the soup for lunch instead of a candy. It's not fair! Variant of this style: I - the center of the earth. Everything that exists in this world, created for me. The work - to pay me the money, his wife - to cook me dinner and wash my shirts, Natasha (as well as the Luba, Marina, and Vera) - fun, friends - to drink beer, television - to watch football. True, the world has one drawback: not all give to make peace. Friends with me do not always agree, head for some reason wants me to come to work on time or even every day, Marina somehow opposed to Luba, Luba - against Vera and Marina, and his wife - against all the three (about Natasha, she does not know). This is unfair!

Egoist. Not quite the same as that child. Well, well, I'm not the center of the earth. But I told them I will! In the end, it is my right - to demand what I want. Yes, I am - not a child, I understand that other people have their own interests, not like me. But I do not care for them! The main thing - it's me. If you have - I'll go over the corpses, but get what I want. Reasonable selfish. The corpses do not walk ... Such people, in contrast to the selfish than usual, approximately 50% of people are not caused by anger, and even some sympathy. Of itself does not care - no one really care. They give you - take it. Brothers - this is nice. If you offer something that can bring you favor - why not agree? Even if this "something" was a single copy, and now someone will not get ... in the end, I'm no one takes nothing away. I have exactly the same rights to this thing, like everyone else, and someone should it be obtained - so why not me?

Altruists. Someone calls this style of worship, someone contempt for someone of such people simply do not understand. "Crazy" or "holy"? Neither one nor the other. Just people. If not me, then who? "Give it all to another, because to give - it is so nice. To give things, money, time, force ... I know that in doing so help to someone, and therefore it must be done. I can not live without it. If any thing can get all or me or anyone else, and we have equal rights to this thing - we must give it to another, otherwise I will torment the conscience for what I am someone of something denied.

Group selfish. As can be seen under the name belongs to a certain group. It could be family, friends, football team, student groups, staff at work, or one person - a favorite, or just a dog or cat. In relation to members of their group, the group behaves like an egotist is a real altruist, in relation to everyone else - as selfish, and not always sensible. An interesting feature: members can adhere to a different style of life! Serge, Marinochka and Vadik, Mom, Dad ... This is my family - husband, children, parents. I'll give all that they were happy. I will do everything they can. Let even the whole world will collapse, but they all should be well.

The connoisseur of pleasure. Is not necessarily a selfish or a child. World - such a good thing. It, of course, a lot of bad, but many good. And it is good to catch, so as not ceased. Well, for instance, I was lying on the couch, my leg is broken, I can not stand, and all the people on the beach ... would have been if the rain did not go ... well, and whenever else I could see this movie? Tape a long rests, and look - there has been insufficient. And here is a sandwich is a ham. Pink juicy slice - and smell! About the taste I do not speak. Especially on a hungry stomach. Tasty piece ... Outside, the rain, the air fresh, cool and not stuffy. Good ... Pleasant breeze in the window ... No, life - is good. Variety Connoisseurs pleasures - Optimist. They both look at life positively, but the connoisseur of pleasure all the pleasant facts of life relishing, and Optimist - only to note the fact of their existence.

Rationalist. He does not do those things, which recognizes the irrational. Do not need to do something that is not worth the effort. For example, why go to the movies, if the same film can be seen on television or on tape? Moreover, the film is not to say that good, so I watch it I will not: just wasting time. I have enough work to be done, therefore, be inappropriate at a time when I was the most workable, to look ridiculous movie, and then deal with the case at night when you want to sleep and my head does not understand anything. Despite his views, is not always a man of dry and stale! Angry - irrationally. Who from this will be better? I just spend my nerves, but did not achieve. A drug addict. The man had become dependent on something; deprived of this "something" turns into a morbid physical or mental condition. In the role of the drug can serve alcohol, gambling, favorite work, the computer in general and the Internet in particular, any thing, process or people. This does not include physiological needs, for as long as they are not imposed unwarranted restrictions. For example, a thirst - this is normal and what its address - is personal matter, but if people can not drink tea, and Al-two-oh and "Bring him coffee, coffee, and if not - then life becomes a torment, then coffee for this man - a drug.

Collector. You can collect anything: stamps, postcards, cacti, wallpapers, friends, life style:) (this is my case). What distinguishes the collector of a normal person? But that is not collectable for him vital. For example, if someone set 7 graphics editors, which occupy almost the entire hard disk, it is not a collector, if it - amateur or professional - but still engaged in computer graphics. But if all this is not the case - this is a collector. I collect life styles, because my style suited me just fine. But if I was going to change his style and so was looking for a suitable - it will not be collecting.

Floating downstream. Whether that will be ... Depends on me not so much. I'm not to blame for that does not succeed, that was not what had once wanted to be: it is all the circumstances.

Free man. He considers himself free from all claims and did not want to associate themselves in any style of life: does so today, and tomorrow the opposite ... This is also a lifestyle.

Lack of style. The man who does not have their own views and beliefs. Lives, as have. This is not the same as the free man: he does so out of conviction, a man with no style ... belief he has, by definition, no.

Laggards. Do not have time for anything. Closer to the night very romantic set up, so go to bed late, late in the morning to school / work, considers himself an altruist, on charges of selfishness and offended for a long time on this subject is suffering. Suffering hinder tuition / work session, do not give up, the work goes wrong. Persistently repeating their mistakes, although clearly sees the error of their friends and relatives and is able to competently analyze them. Excellent imagination, but imagination has no time to implement - only gets to the workplace (where are the paint, paper, typewriter, computer, staff etc.) - All lost. Sadly remarked: "Oh, with my head today and ten years ago!"